Why single payer health care is good

A single-payer system allows choice of licensed health care professionals and accredited facilities and automatically covers all medically necessary care, with a focus on preventive care. It includes alternatives supported by evidence, including chiropractor and acupuncture services, and gives equal consideration to physical and mental health needs. Decisions on treatment are left to the patients and their doctors.

Single payer covers all of us. Every resident of California is in the system and can receive health care when we need it. While we have the resources — excellent medical schools and research centers, dedicated health care professionals, and the latest technology — our current approach to financing health care skews delivery. It keeps millions of people from being able to contribute responsibly and leaves millions without needed care.

The pieces of a potentially excellent system cannot form a coherent whole. A single-payer system puts in place the financing mechanism and the cost and quality parameters necessary to achieve sustainable universal health care so that everyone has the care they need when they need it, at a price they can afford. Single-payer is the ultimate freedom to choose. You can choose to go to school, change jobs, start a new business, retire, or stay home and care for children and parents.

Billions of dollars spent on insurance now go toward administering multiple plans, packaging and marketing the plans, excessive profits and executive compensation, lobbying for policies that detract from health care, and for campaign donations.

Single-payer streamlines administration by having one agency handle all financing and by giving everyone the same benefits. Health care professionals will no longer incur the cost of dealing with so many different plans, rules, and forms. Costs are rising at rates far beyond inflation. Charges for health insurance premiums and care vary dramatically and are difficult to justify. Reimbursement for services and supplies is unpredictable. This guide will present both the single-payer health care pros and cons so you can draw your own conclusion about this complex and divisive topic.

If you are familiar with our health care system, you know that it relies heavily on the private sector. Even the Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare, uses private health insurance companies to offer government-regulated plans through a marketplace. However, there are still federally sponsored programs like Medicaid, CHIP, and Medicare that provide subsidized or free health care to those who qualify using taxpayer dollars. Medicare for all and single-payer are synonymous.

The end goal of both is to have the healthcare industry run and regulated by the government and take private health insurance companies out of the mix. This would be achieved by using taxpayer money to completely fund all medical costs in the US, giving everyone access to health care.

So the question remains,. Completely shifting the health care system in the US is no easy task. There are so many moving parts under the current system that even the slightest change in policy can set off a chain reaction, which is something we saw with the Affordable Care Act. Today, health care is not considered a right in the US which is a debate within itself. The single biggest benefit of switching over to Medicare for all is that everyone has health coverage and access to the coverage they need without having to worry about the costs.

According to Bankrate, a study from showed that more and more Americans are putting money ahead of medical attention. The study showed,". Inequalities in health care is really a terrible thing. I encountered this in my life and I really recommend it to anyone. I hope that something will change in this regard. So Harvard thinks that a giant, anonymous federal bureaucracy would give all of us improved health care. Health care is out of control because there are too many government bureaucrats and anonymous insurance functionaries taking money out of the system.

Your comment has been cloned from other right-wing responses throughout the years. What system could be closer to patient-doctor than single payer? Do you prefer a system where insurance is determined by an employer, the deals that employer has with health insurance companies, the deal those companies have with certain doctors, and the deal those doctors have with drug companies?

Is that your idea? Please go spew your right-wing nonsense somewhere else. Just ask the people that voted for Brexit, and may well come to regret it. If the U. However, I also wonder just how much medical advance we would have made without the growth of publicly owned companies in this system.

Those shareholder dollars paid or great advances. The flip side is that it was shareholder money, and that means driving profit, instead of better patient-based outcomes, such as satisfaction and customer service. Want to reduce pain in your knees and be more active?

Eat smarter and reduce your risk for a heart attack? Sleep the entire night so you have more energy during the day? Take control of your health right now!

Thanks for visiting. Don't miss your FREE gift. Sign up to get tips for living a healthy lifestyle, with ways to fight inflammation and improve cognitive health , plus the latest advances in preventative medicine, diet and exercise , pain relief, blood pressure and cholesterol management, and more. Get helpful tips and guidance for everything from fighting inflammation to finding the best diets for weight loss Stay on top of latest health news from Harvard Medical School.

Recent Blog Articles. Cancer survivors' sleep is affected long after treatment. What to do when elective surgery is postponed. What happened to trusting medical experts?

Stuttering in children: How parents can help. Evoking calm: Practicing mindfulness in daily life helps. If a medication or treatment is approved as being safe then any doctor can use it. The result is far better treatments and ultimately a far better standard of life for those undergoing treatments.

This is why many people who are in single healthcare systems still come to the United States for treatments. You also need to look at it from the point of view that medication under a single health care system is going to be a lot cheaper. It is not free, but it is heavily subsidized.

This means that staying healthy with medication should be affordable. Medications, even with insurance, in the United States are expensive.